stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

If the ones from Stellarvue also share these specs, then there is no doubt they come from the same assembly line. I haven't used it in the field and it's pretty heavy but it's my best shot and easy access. I do most of my observing with 82 degree eyepieces. This particular line saw its sales creamed by the superior ES 82s when the price on the latter was reduced. If the grading system of your university uses letter grades, you can assign a number to each letter grade. Why 5 stars? I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. 51,000 students. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. While low cost for a 100 eyepiece, consider import fees if ordering from Europe. The new TS UWANs are waterproof and filled with nitrogen. Ive never been a fan of zoom eyepieces. The field is so wide it can be hard to see the edge of the field. I find I kind of have to make myself use them more often. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. TS have kept the old 4/7/16mm focal length specifications. Several functions may not work. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. I think you will find a wide range of preferences. Having tried 52, 60, 70, 76 and 82, I'll stick between 70 and 82. It can just matter on how you want to frame objects personally I feel 60o or less FOV is like looking through a tunnel so I dont use those EP's as much even though I have some. I'd also be interested to hear if anyone's tried these and has some thoughts on them. I doubt Vic Maris will reveal who his OEM is. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. The 28mm UWAN does not appear to be available any longer, but here is an old CN article about the line. No. Not quite so easy a question. I was surprised! I think probably not. Mega gratz on your new scope NIckwin. All of this experimenting made me settle on 70 as a nice middle ground. But I can't confirm, and they could be a whole new OEM same as the luminos perhaps, rather than the initial SV82 which I am pretty sure was the UWAN. I think these are the same that WO(?) The jump from 50 to 70 provides a much larger leap than 70 to 100 to my eyes. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvue's Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Can't beat it for the price, especially since the market has gone insane. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). If theres one premium eyepiece to buy, it will likely be in this focal length range. Top-ranked German Universities in Munich. The value for current overall gradeis the numerical value corresponding to your current overall letter grade. Which points out that the appropriate high power apparent field depends a lot on the focal length of the scope and whether the scope is tracking. When I decided that I wasn't agreeing with an eyepiece, I sold it back on the used market for what I paid for it. It is Bavaria's largest city and the third largest city in Germany (after Berlin and Hamburg). You probably won't notice the difference. Based on the 14mm SSW, I can recommended the series, though they are even more costly than Nagler Type 6s. The knurled grip rings and construction of both are superb. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) Heres a low-cost zoom eyepiece that actually works well. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers. They're still well regarded, though the 28mm is said to be ergonomically awkward to view through. 3. I still focused on the field stop and never got the spacewalk views others enjoy. Your scope is a f5.9. The Panoptic 27mm has an even more pleasing view. MyGermanUniversity.com is Germany's largest database for English-language Bachelors and Masters programs (refers to degree programs with at least 50% English-taught course modules from German universities). The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. I bought this and the 4.7mm on a whim when picking up an SV60. A year ago, they had 3 focal lengths of 82 eyepieces of 4, 7, and 16mm, and I reported them in the 2016 Guide to eyepieces. Im hoping these will perform similarly. Never occurred to me that they might actually be the same. #wo_online_image, #wo_offline_image { Nice wide field. The eyepieces name comes from Wide-Angle Long-Eye-Relief and its Canadian designer Glen Speers. Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view(, 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree, Our EUW eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #48, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) #52, private (state-approved) University of Applied Sciences, View all 231 courses still open for next intake, Marketing services for German Universities. Please Log In to view the details for this classified ad. In the case of the old JOC days, the axiom LX 15mm was probably the same as the 14mm UWA. I just purchased a SV80A (really excited) and they had deal going where you get the 8mm and 15mm for a little over $100 so I jumped on it. Very comfortable, bright and sharp. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights. Although I don't believe I've tried any other the eyepieces. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. I strongly recommend both the 20 mm and 9 mm Optimus. Drop it in a barlow or a slow Mak and it's tolerable. We recommend this as the ideal deep sky eyepiece for viewing nebulae, clusters and galaxies. Might it not be that Stellarvue just have updated the specifications so that they better represents reality? At least I think they are new because I can't find anything about these focal lengths, they currently have 4, 8, and 15mm available. While the 76 Baader Morpheus provides slightly less field of view than the rest, the long eye relief and excellent image quality makes it new favorite of mine, and worthy of consideration. Except for the Orion Lanthanum 80, all have 1.25-inch barrels and so can be used on any telescope. However, the Omegon and Meade both have apparent fields closer to 90 as I measured it. But its the design and optical ease of a design that makes an eyepiece good for me. And there are some very good options.. For wide field eyepieces, TeleVue introduced nearly all the modern designs starting with the first Nagler more than 40 years ago. The specifications state an 86 apparent field but it appeared to be the same as the other 82 models. They're just too big and heavy and more of a novelty view for me, whereas my 82's are quite comfortable. Guess I never answered the OP's real question here - favorite FOV, lol. I'll have to change this in the upcoming 2017 Buyer's Guide. I did sell a lot of axiom LXs though, and owned the 23mm for a while and was impressed with it. It just felt like a 68-degree field that was pushed slightly further out. The amount of head tilt needed to see the edges of the field are less than other ~100 degree eyepieces, including Ethos, ES, and APM. It's a great eyepiece. This is like binge watching 4 seasons of a great show with a total cliff-hanger at the end of season 4, only to have the network cancel the show. Each of the eight elements are fully multi-coated, edge blackened and the lens barrel and baffles are similarly dark black. At TUM, grades from 1 to 5 are assigned. I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm. It's all part of the marketing game. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. There are lots of OEM products floating around. Because they're Stellarvue! There are more expensive products, but do they perform any better? Thanks! All rights reserved. Though more costly, the Stellarvue Optimus also stood out for price vs. performance in a full 100 eyepiece. . ***Apparent Field of View measured in degrees. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. I have a 4.5mm Morpheus and a 4.7mm Ethos SX. I briefly experimented with a 100-degree eyepiece but it felt exactly like the 82-degree field, with the exception of shorter eye relief. In the refractor, though, the 4.5 Morpheus comes into its own, with plenty of drift time with a focal length over 1100mm shorter. As good as these 82 eyepieces are, if your budget allows, you might want to consider an even wider 100 eyepiece. Orion sold them as did WO too. and even less can be tolerated in condition of tacking mount. Performance is excellent, with stars sharp across all but the outer 10 percent of the field. The Stellarvue 82 and Meades new PWA provide good performance for a much lower price. Hmmm, looks like those four focal lengths are the only ones they make, at least for now. With 20mm of eye relief and a large eye lens, this is a very comfortable eyepiece to look through. Bottom Line: A better bargain 82 eyepiece. Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. Haven't noticed these before. Bottom Line: A good, economical choice for Schmidt-Cassegrains. This counterweight system is used to quickly adjust balance on smaller telescopes when eyepieces of different weights used. However, on a Schmidt-Cassegrain, with its more forgiving f/10 focal ratio, off-axis sharpness was much better. This is not recommended for shared computers. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. Super crisp images to the edges. It can fit either a 2-inch or 1.25-inch focuser but requires only 1.25-inch filters. Below shows the 100 degree Ethos alongside the 82 degree Nagler. I am also intrigued by the 4mm. Bottom Line: Economical but with optical flaws. Despite its modest price and sharp optics, I cant recommend it. Looks like at this time they are all available. Cool, thanks for the info! The latter had good optical performance, but with a twist-up eyecup mechanism that was stiff and greasy in the unit I tested. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/. It is important the image stays sharp as it crosses the field, and it does in both eyepieces, but the Ethos SX is better for double stars and planets. My bad experience with the 14 Meade put a bad taste in my mouth so I stuck to the big series 4000 version, and never gave the 5000s and axiom LX much thought even when I had access to try them whenever I wanted . Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. I tested this set on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. All of my scopes are on manual mounts, so I agree, the larger the AFOV the better. Personally, I find the 70-72 degree range perfect for my needs and taste; and there are plenty of offerings in that range with adequate effective eye relief for eyeglass wearers. I've spent a decent amount of time with an 82-degree eyepiece, but the extra field never seemed very immersive to me. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. I started with the A-T and would still have it if my wife did not wear glasses (I'm guessing it's only a matter of time for me as well). Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. But what matters is who you buy it from, the specifications, customer service, reliability, and price (of course), when making your actual purchasing decision. Features --20mm focal length --100 apparent field --15mm eye relief --9 element design --fully multi-coated On axis the field is nice but as you creep out from the center the curvature becomes apparent. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. This is the original 100 eyepiece and is still the standard of excellence. Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? I had the pleasure of looking through all of the Optimus eyepieces with Vic at the DSSP. The Meade and Omegon represent great values. 2023 Astromart.com. That makes swapping eyepieces at high magnifications easier. . Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. I really like the 82 FoV in my scope, great image, easy to manage and store. Bottom Line: Another fine ultra-wide eyepiece for the money. The result given here is non-binding, as this grade converter can only provide a general first estimation. Pros: Low price; good eye relief; solid construction. The rubber eyecup can be raised higher with the use of an included extension ring; a twist-up mechanism would have been preferable. Unfortunately EP focal lengths are rarely exactly accurate and in the case of the axioms they were obviously paying homage to the original 23mm axiom and 24mm was close enough to call a 23. Bottom Line: A superb and compact top-class eyepiece. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. It looks very similar to the Stellarvue 82. Holding your eye in the proper position is way easier. #32 Times Higher Education Ranking. All marketing. At under $200 this eyepiece is a great way to get those wide views at a reasonable price. The eye has to be a little above the eyecup for best position, with eye relief just 12mm. They are still the best but are expensive. I had been planning on getting ES 82 degree EP's, but I just couldn't pass these up for the $. Like twins separated at birth, Meades MWA (Mega Wide Angle) looks nearly identical to the Omegon Panorama2. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view(click here for specifications), 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view (click here for specifications), 15.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degreeapparent field of view(click here for specifications). But it is an excellent and attractive, though large, eyepiece at a slightly lower price than a Nagler with much better eye relief. For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. But yea I mainly like using EP's in the 70 - 82o FOV range. Probably not by much, if at all. I had the 15mm and it lasted 2 weeks in my case. The top dust cap fits on only when the eyecup is retracted, an inconvenience. Edited by timmbottoni, 03 November 2014 - 08:49 PM. $65 a piece is very cheapfor these eyepieces, so you did a very good deal there. While the NexStar SE/Evolution Celestron, Celestron Tabletop Tripod, NexStar SE. This was part of a 3 piece set and I won't be using this one. : Yes Filter Thread? However, eyepiece preferences are very personal and you will find a lot of different opinions on this series and its individual focal length. The contrast is good and the view is clear from edge to edge. Top 100 Worldwide. i think that what you are going to hear is : "what are you interested in looking at ?" You sometimes feel more like you are actually there, in the view. Well, that was true until the Stellarvue 28mm / 82. Stellarvue 8mm UWA 82 degree eyepice that has never been used. This is an enthusiast's forum - these folks typically take good care of their stuff. At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. Most suffer from variable plossl, svbony, SVBONY Zoom Eyepiece, Zoom eyepiece. Seeing the outer 10 degrees in direct vision is not so easily done. Optical performance is also identical and excellent for the money. I don't know how much help my opinion will be but I will certainly share what I can when I have them in front of me. Our EUW eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. Edited by 25585, 06 March 2023 - 09:04 AM. : I tested these on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. any limitations are just limitations and can not be named "favorite", (2) acceptable (not a favorite) eyepiece AFOV depends from nature of observing object. Uhno. Those I find are easiest to use. They look absolutely identical apart from a few superficial features (eyecup, 1.25" barrel and rubber grip band). The 100 eyepiece tripod. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. Field stops are different. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Enter the maximum grade, the minimum passing grade, and your current overall grade in the grading system of your university. Stellarvue 8mm UWA Ultra Wide Angle 82 degree 1.25" Eyepiece - New. Not saying that's a bad thing, just sort of distracting. We have the same scope, so I can give you a few pointers to consider. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. National Ranking. There are also 60 degree eyepieces like the Starguider ED and Paradigms. And the included velvety storage bag is very nice. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. The A-T is darn close, but does give more magnification and FOV. This grade conversion formula, together with your degree programs Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), is a tool to help your convert grades earned in countries other than Germany. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. There are many really good ones available in this category, all across the price spectrum. Don't have an Astromart account? The grades represent the following assessments of the examination performances: Talent Development, Scholarships and Awards, Verification of Study Periods for Pension Insurance, Mission Statement and Teaching Constitution, TUM Center for Digital Leadership Development, Digital Programs of Executive and Professional Education, Office of the Senior Executive Vice President, TUMonline TUMs campus management portal, Academic and Examination Regulations (FPSO), resolution of the Kultusministerkonferenz, 1.01.5 very good: excellent performance, 1.62.5 good: performance well above average, 2.63,5 satisfactory: average performance, 3.64.0 sufficient: performance meets the standards in spite of deficiencies, from 4.1 fail: performance does not meet the standards because of substantial deficiencies. Meades new PWA (Premium Wide Angle) series is effectively a new version of their previous 82 UWA series, which is still available as of November 2020. Those look just like the WO UWANs, and they are in the exact same focal lengths. Thus my max AFOVs are; 2.5 is 45 degrees, 3.5 is 65, 4 is 45 degrees, 4.5 is 76 degrees, 5 and 5.2 are 65 degrees, 6.5 is 76 degrees, 7 and 8 are 65 degrees, 9 is 76 degrees, 10 is 70 degrees, 12 is 92 degrees, 13 is 65 degrees, 14 is 80 degrees, 15 is 62 degrees, 17 is 92 degrees, 18 is 62 degrees, 20 is 80 degrees, 22 is 82 degrees, 25 is 60 degrees, 26 is 62 degrees, 28 is 68 degrees, 30 is 80 degrees, 31 is 82 degrees, 34 is 68 degrees, 40 is 70 degrees, 55 is 50 degrees. This eyepiece gives me 133x mag in my 10 inch Dobsonian. If so, you will need eyepieces with longer eye relief. 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. I purchased the 9mm to pair with the 20mm Optimus for my Stellarvue SVX125D refractor. That doesn't happen with 100 degree eyepieces. The 16mm is often considered the weakest of the line (though still a decent performer) and I've read a lot of good things about the 4mm. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. To be totally fair, not all eyeglass wearers are the same or require the same amount of eye relief. Has similar build quality to TeleVue and has a better feel than its APM counterpart. Thanks. In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. I have the Stellarvue 15mm UWA and it needs some focal length to clean up the field as curvature starts getting beyond tolerable for my eye around the 65-70% mark in an f/7 600mm refractor. Drift time is about 20 seconds. Tele Vues Type 6 Naglers are small, light and tack sharp across the field, even on fast f-ratio telescopes. They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). I'll be curiously watching how this pans out as to the origins of these EP's, if they end up being the old UWANs they are priced pretty competitively. I have never used any of the super mega ultra extra wide eyepieces. Night Sky Challenges and the Astronomical League. Pop. The 8-element Morpheus design provides nearly top-class performance for much less than the premium competition, which would also include Tele Vues 72 Delos series. There has always been a good OEM behind WO and SV, but the winner is the consumer, who quite frankly doesn't care because the consumer can't buy directly from the OEM. They are obviously not a redesigned barrel on the old ones. The Orion and Vixen 82 eyepieces are also superb in all aspects, though at prices similar to Tele Vue. It performs well on faster telescopes, a key characteristic of Nagler and Ethos eyepieces. Please note that this tool is only intended to provide a first orientation and the results are in no way binding. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. No question they set the standard. }. With a 10 inch Newtonian at an f5 focal ratio, the 50mm eyepiece you are considering will produce a 10mm exit pupil. Or know anything about the design and/or origins? Good heft without being too heavy. Not to say that normal 50 and wide-field 65 eyepieces arent excellent, but for a more immersive viewing experience most telescope owners add at least one, if not several ultra-wide 82 eyepieces to their collection. Going Wide: Nine 82-Degree Eyepieces Compared, A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces, Price and Quality in a High-Power Zoom: SVBONY 3mm-8mm Zoom Review, Celestron Tabletop Tripod Review: Sometimes Smaller is Better. public University. But once i start using something around 1m+ in focal length, I find 70+ degrees is preferable, and if it matches nicely with the scope, the more apparent field the merrier. It's hard to keep track of them all. While stars do bloat a little at the very edge, the 83 SSW comes close to matching a Nagler for optical performance, with the benefit of slightly longer 14mm eye relief and a more comfortable twist-up eyecup. Effect of barlows / field flatness for AT60ED solar imaging.

Durham University Economics Staff, Cheryl Araujo Daughters Where Are They Now, Waterford Senior Center Trips, Parosmia Home Remedies, Brockton Boxers Football, Articles S